The reading
vs 289 peers · YC · AI & ML Infrastructure · older vintages pooled
includes code signals as of Jun 17, 2026
A level reading. The file carries no history yet, so no trend is claimed.
Not enough longitudinal signal yet to call momentum; read this as a low-confidence estimate.
Cross-checks agree: 1 check run. 1 check · details
Independent reads of this company were compared. Each check below names what was compared and what it found.
- agreeAI claim vs code evidence. AI claim is corroborated by code evidence. · cohortwatch:ai_scores
Trigger.dev is compared within 289 peers (YC · AI & ML Infrastructure · older vintages pooled): cohort position not stated: the older-vintage peer pool is too coarse for a fair rank.
Not enough longitudinal signal yet to call momentum; read this as a low-confidence estimate. Strongest signal: code (66/100). Capital collection is inactive in this export, so no capital observation affects the displayed score.
Weights: Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%. Updated Jul 14, 2026 · planned refresh ~Jul 21 · score version momentum-v2.
Signal record
Signal breakdown
Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%, renormalised over the families present in the scoring record. Each meter is that family’s 0-100 sub-score. Direct source links appear when the public export carries them.
Linked evidence
Available public sources
This ledger shows the public source links carried by the export.
- ClaimAccelerator: Y Combinator W23 · AI & ML Infrastructure · AI-enabledsource· as of Jun 15, 2026
- CodePublic code & package activity foundsource· as of Jun 19, 2026
- HiringOpen job board foundsource· as of Jun 19, 2026
- Capitalcollector inactive No capital observation exists in this export. Capital has no effect on the displayed score.Inactive
- WebWebsite on record (accelerator directory)source· as of Jun 15, 2026
History
Momentum over time
No trend claimed
Not enough history to measure a trend yet tracked weekly across active sources.
0 of 6 weekly readings. A trend appears at 6