Neodocs
neodocs.inclaimed; not independently verified
20 people
The reading
vs 580 peers · YC · Healthcare & Life Sciences · older vintages pooled
A level reading. The file carries no history yet, so no trend is claimed.
Not enough longitudinal signal yet to call momentum; read this as a low-confidence estimate.
Nothing to cross-validate yet: no publishable checks for this company.
Neodocs is compared within 580 peers (YC · Healthcare & Life Sciences · older vintages pooled): cohort position not stated: the older-vintage peer pool is too coarse for a fair rank.
Not enough longitudinal signal yet to call momentum; read this as a low-confidence estimate. Strongest signal: hiring (62/100). Capital collection is inactive in this export, so no capital observation affects the displayed score.
Weights: Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%. Updated Jul 14, 2026 · planned refresh ~Jul 21 · score version momentum-v2.
Signal record
Signal breakdown
Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%, renormalised over the families present in the scoring record. Each meter is that family’s 0-100 sub-score. Direct source links appear when the public export carries them.
Linked evidence
Available public sources
The signal record above drives scoring. This linked-source ledger is narrower: at least one present scoring signal has no matching direct link in the public export.
- ClaimAccelerator: Y Combinator S21 · Healthcare & Life Sciences · AI-enabled (claimed; not independently verified)source· as of Jun 15, 2026
- Codenot found Not found; lowers confidence, not a zeroNot found
- Hiringsignal present No direct source link is included in this export.No direct link
- Capitalcollector inactive No capital observation exists in this export. Capital has no effect on the displayed score.Inactive
- WebWebsite on record (accelerator directory)source· as of Jun 15, 2026
History
Momentum over time
No trend claimed
Not enough history to measure a trend yet tracked weekly across active sources.
0 of 6 weekly readings. A trend appears at 6