Skip to content
CohortWatch

MangoDesk

mangodesk.com
YC · S25Enterprise & Vertical SoftwareAI-enabled

claimed; not independently verified

2 people

Updated Aug 10, 2026

The reading

45out of 100
HoldingMedium confidence

vs 217 peers · YC · Enterprise & Vertical Software · similar vintage

includes code signals as of Jun 17, 2026

A level reading. The file carries no history yet, so no trend is claimed.

The published read

Holding steady against its YC Enterprise & Vertical Software peers.

Nothing to cross-validate yet: no publishable checks for this company.

0peer median 50100

MangoDesk’s score of 45 is below the peer median (50) for 217 peers (YC · Enterprise & Vertical Software · similar vintage): score position on the 0-100 scale, not a percentile rank; we show the spread, not a global rank.

Why this score

Holding steady against its YC Enterprise & Vertical Software peers. Against the peer median of 50 for YC · Enterprise & Vertical Software · similar vintage, MangoDesk’s score of 45 is below the peer median. Strongest signal: code (46/100). Capital collection is inactive in this export, so no capital observation affects the displayed score.

Weights: Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%. Updated Aug 10, 2026 · planned refresh ~Aug 17 · score version momentum-v2.

Signal record

Signal breakdown

Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%, renormalised over the families present in the scoring record. Each meter is that family’s 0-100 sub-score. Direct source links appear when the public export carries them.

Hiring
weight 0.40 · Direct source
Hiring signal present; 36/100 vs cohort peersAshby
36/100
Code
weight 0.30 · Direct source
Code & package adoption present; 46/100 vs cohort peersPyPI
46/100
Capital
weight 0.30 · one-sided · Not observed
Collector inactive in this export: no capital observation; no effect on displayed score.
N/A

Linked evidence

Available public sources

This ledger shows the public source links carried by the export.

History

Momentum over time

readings on file: 00–100 scalethe ledger

Not enough history to measure a trend yet tracked weekly across active sources.

0 of 6 weekly readings. A trend appears at 6