The reading
vs 137 peers · YC · Enterprise & Vertical Software · similar vintage
A level reading. The file carries no history yet, so no trend is claimed.
Not enough longitudinal signal yet to call momentum; read this as a low-confidence estimate.
Cross-checks agree: the 1 check run agrees. 1 check · details
Independent reads of this company were compared. Each check below names what was compared and what it found.
- agreeAI level vs ML hiring/build motion. Low AI level; ML motion not expected. · cohortwatch:ai_scores · observations
Lance is compared within 137 peers (YC · Enterprise & Vertical Software · similar vintage): data is thin, so we don't state a percentile yet.
Not enough longitudinal signal yet to call momentum; read this as a low-confidence estimate. Strongest signal: hiring (54/100). Capital collection is inactive in this export, so no capital observation affects the displayed score.
Weights: Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%. Updated Jul 14, 2026 · planned refresh ~Jul 21 · score version momentum-v2.
Signal record
Signal breakdown
Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%, renormalised over the families present in the scoring record. Each meter is that family’s 0-100 sub-score. Direct source links appear when the public export carries them.
Linked evidence
Available public sources
This ledger shows the public source links carried by the export.
- ClaimAccelerator: Y Combinator W26 · Enterprise & Vertical Software · Non-AIsource· as of Jun 15, 2026
- Codenot found Not found; lowers confidence, not a zeroNot found
- HiringOpen job board foundsource· as of Jun 19, 2026
- Capitalcollector inactive No capital observation exists in this export. Capital has no effect on the displayed score.Inactive
- WebWebsite on record (accelerator directory)source· as of Jun 15, 2026
History
Momentum over time
No trend claimed
Not enough history to measure a trend yet tracked weekly across active sources.
0 of 6 weekly readings. A trend appears at 6