Skip to content
CohortWatch

DiligenceSquared

diligencesquared.com
YC · F25AI & ML InfrastructureAI-enabled

claimed; not independently verified

3 people

Updated Aug 10, 2026

The reading

48out of 100
HoldingMedium confidence

vs 29 peers · YC · AI & ML Infrastructure · similar vintage

includes code signals as of Jun 17, 2026

A level reading. The file carries no history yet, so no trend is claimed.

The published read

Holding steady against its YC AI & ML Infrastructure peers.

Nothing to cross-validate yet: no publishable checks for this company.

0peer median 49100

DiligenceSquared’s score of 48 is around the peer median (49) for 29 peers (YC · AI & ML Infrastructure · similar vintage): within a point of the median, we don’t claim a finer rank.

Why this score

Holding steady against its YC AI & ML Infrastructure peers. Against the peer median of 49 for YC · AI & ML Infrastructure · similar vintage, DiligenceSquared’s score of 48 is around the peer median. Strongest signal: hiring (53/100). Capital collection is inactive in this export, so no capital observation affects the displayed score.

Weights: Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%. Updated Aug 10, 2026 · planned refresh ~Aug 17 · score version momentum-v2.

Signal record

Signal breakdown

Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%, renormalised over the families present in the scoring record. Each meter is that family’s 0-100 sub-score. Direct source links appear when the public export carries them.

Hiring
weight 0.40 · Direct source
Hiring signal present; 53/100 vs cohort peersAshby
53/100
Code
weight 0.30 · Direct source
Code & package adoption present; 37/100 vs cohort peersGitHub
37/100
Capital
weight 0.30 · one-sided · Not observed
Collector inactive in this export: no capital observation; no effect on displayed score.
N/A

Linked evidence

Available public sources

This ledger shows the public source links carried by the export.

History

Momentum over time

readings on file: 00–100 scalethe ledger

Not enough history to measure a trend yet tracked weekly across active sources.

0 of 6 weekly readings. A trend appears at 6