Skip to content
CohortWatch

AfterQuery

afterquery.com
YC · W25AI & ML InfrastructureAI-native

30 people

Updated Jul 14, 2026

The reading

~55out of 100
Low data: estimate, pulled toward 50
UncertainLow data confidence

vs 98 peers · YC · AI & ML Infrastructure · similar vintage

includes code signals as of Jun 17, 2026

A level reading. The file carries no history yet, so no trend is claimed.

Not enough longitudinal signal yet to call momentum; read this as a low-confidence estimate.

Signals not fully consistent: consistency not claimed. 1 check · details

The visible checks below ran, but the full set of signals is not consistent enough to claim agreement. That caps the cross-validated read; it is not a negative verdict.

  • agreeAI claim vs code evidence. AI claim is corroborated by code evidence. · cohortwatch:ai_scores
data is thin, so we don't state a percentile yet
0peer median 50100

AfterQuery is compared within 98 peers (YC · AI & ML Infrastructure · similar vintage): data is thin, so we don't state a percentile yet.

Why this score

Not enough longitudinal signal yet to call momentum; read this as a low-confidence estimate. Strongest signal: hiring (83/100). Capital collection is inactive in this export, so no capital observation affects the displayed score.

Weights: Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%. Updated Jul 14, 2026 · planned refresh ~Jul 21 · score version momentum-v2.

Signal record

Signal breakdown

Hiring 40% · Code 30% · Capital 30%, renormalised over the families present in the scoring record. Each meter is that family’s 0-100 sub-score. Direct source links appear when the public export carries them.

Hiring
weight 0.40
Hiring signal present; 83/100 vs cohort peersAshby
83/100
Code
weight 0.30
Code & package adoption present; 46/100 vs cohort peersGitHub
46/100
Capital
weight 0.30 · one-sided
Collector inactive in this export: no capital observation; no effect on displayed score.
N/A

Linked evidence

Available public sources

This ledger shows the public source links carried by the export.

History

Momentum over time

readings on file: 00–100 scalethe ledger

Not enough history to measure a trend yet tracked weekly across active sources.

0 of 6 weekly readings. A trend appears at 6

File a correction →How is this calculated?